Critically analysing writing style of seed paper: RGB-D Tracking and Optimal Perception of Deformable Objects
I have reviewed my seed paper "RGB-D Tracking and Optimal Perception of Deformable Objects " to assess its strengths and weaknesses. Taking such a perspective has helped me in viewing the paper from a new angle, and various strengths and weaknesses of the papers core content have emerged. They are as follows: 1. Clearly structured but sometimes the transitions are not always smooth or explicitly mentioned The paper is structured into Introduction, Method, Results, Conclusion. The method section is not explicitly mentioned which confused me slightly but overall the sections and subsections seem relevant and appropriately used. Occasionally the transitions from section to section seem not as smooth. For example end of Section II.C (Point Cloud Over-Segmentation into Supervoxels) and section III is abrupt without any transitional sentence linking them together. I think such bridge sentences can make the reading smoother. The paper could also use a Background section to explain ...